The exact details of the armour on Britain's Challenger 2 are classified, but we can surmise from its high weight that it leans more towards protection than speed. Better designs and technology have helped overcome this problem, although only to a certain extent. The better armed, and armoured, tanks became, the more their speed was reduced – at least, in principle. Therefore, there has generally been an inverse relationship between these different elements. Throughout their history, the design of tanks has varied based on the balancing of, and trade-off between, their level of armoured protection, the power and size of their main guns, and their speed. A comparison of the available information about both models of tank then follows. This is a difficult question to answer definitively, for reasons that will be outlined below, but what follows is an examination of Britain's Challenger 2 and what many think of as Russia's Main Battle Tank (MBT), the T-14 Armata. Russia vs Britain: How do their militaries stack up?īut how do British and Russian tanks compare today?.The First Time Tanks Came Face-To-Face In Battle.Tanks and infantry – the almost-forgotten war-winning combination.Thus, Russia, too, has a prominent place in the history of the tank. Slower to industrialise, the USSR, meanwhile, expanded its war manufacturing exponentially during the Second World War, turned the tide at Stalingrad, and cranked out what many consider to be the war's best tank: the T-34.Ĭheaply and efficiently made, with a brilliant design featuring sloped frontal armour, vast numbers of T-34s poured off production lines where they swamped German tanks on the battlefield. As the nation that invented the world's first tank, brought it into battle in 1916 at the Somme, and then deployed it in spectacular fashion the following year at Cambrai, Britain can claim a special place in the history of armoured warfare.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |